After reading chapter 6 and 7 of the textbook, Philosophy the Power of Assignment

After reading chapter 6 and 7 of the textbook, Philosophy the Power of Ideas, effect the following questions - Assignment Examplene Descartes, however, realized that although he could doubtfulness everything else, he could not doubt his very own existence because existence is a sine qua non for doubting. His doubting self/existence whence became the starting point of his theory of acquaintance. Having proved his existence, Rene Descartes went on to prove the existence of God. Descartes argued that since doubting is less correct than to know/knowledge, he was an im entire being Descartes realized that there must be a perfect being that does not doubt, a being that knows everything. Descartes concluded that the perfect being is God. Descartes, therefore, argued that God is the truth and in all other things share in the truth of God. God therefore became the metaphysical basis of Descartes Epistemology. Descartes concluded that everything that we butt conceive clearly and distinc tly is true because it is a participation God, the truth itself. An evaluation of Descartes theory of knowledge shows that the theory was a phenomenal milestone in Philosophy, the theory challenged Philosophers to base their arguments only on lawful truths, rather than, on believes and doctrines that have no logical basis.Question 2. Thomas Hobbes was a thorough deviation strongist. Hobbes argued that all reality is material, including thoughts, feelings and ideas. Hobbes argued that all reality in the universe can be explained in material form, i.e. in name of the motions and the interactions of material bodies. For this reason, Hobbes denied existence of any immaterial reality. For this reason, Hobbes saw human beings as machines, operational solely according to the physical laws For Hobbes therefore all human actions can be explained in terms of cause and effect.An evaluation of this theory reveals one glaring shortcoming Hobbes did not give a adequate and convincing account of how human thoughts and ideas are material in nature Hobbes did not give a convincing argument on how the motions and interactions of